Do I really need a firewall?
Thread poster: Heinrich Pesch
| | Heinrich Pesch
Local time: 21:03
Finnish to German
In my home-office I use a wireless modem which is protected. Do I nonetheless need a firewall in my laptop machine?
I use ZoneAlarm, but in the event log I see no entries. Does that mean there were no attempts to entry my system from outside?
My system is Vista Business.
[Bearbeitet am 2008-10-02 13:19]
| | Igor Anikeev
Local time: 22:03
English to Russian
| I believe you do || Oct 2, 2008 |
I assume you are using a Windows machine. And then you need a firewall anyway, unless it's Vista (some people may disagree, but I've had a very nice experience with Vista and external firewall, which may be the way your "protected modem" is).
On the other hand, running a firewall is never a bad idea =) Regardless of the OS.
| | Shai Navé
Local time: 21:03
English to Hebrew
| It can't hurt, but it is up to you || Oct 2, 2008 |
By wireless modem I'm assuming that you refer to a modem which is connected to a wireless router. Most of the new routers have a built in Firewall and they also have a NAT feature (which I won't go into rigt now but you can find a lot of information about it in the internet). If this indeed describes your setup you are pretty well protected from from attempts from outside of your home network (WAN). However, the router protects only from inbound attempts from sources outside of your home network, if for example your home networl comprised of a laptop and a desktop computers than they are not protected from one another. since they are both sharing he same network if one of them will get infected by a virus, other malicious software than it could spread easily to the other computer(s) on the network unless they are protected by a software firewall.
So basically I would recommend you to use a software firewall as another layer of protection if you have more than one computer on your network. The built-in windows firewall should do, but you can use other as well of course (Zonealarm, Comodo, etc.).
Another arguably important feature that most software firewall have is the outbound protection. The firewall in your router provide you only wih an inbound protection (according to its set of rules) but doesn't provide you with any indication about an outgoing traffic. I said that it is arguably important because some claim that it is very important to monitor which application from your computer tries to connect to the internet, thus enabling you to identify suspicious activity. Other (and I included) claim that most home users doesn't bother to check to much, and just approve anything since they just want things to work. I also thing that preventing in the first place from malicious entities from penetrating your computer is more important than monitoring their later outbound activity.
To conclude, it is not a bad idea to use a software firewall as an extra layer of protection (especially if you have more than one computer/device on the same network). But nevertheless never stop practicing the best line of defense, in my opinion, which is your common sense. take precautionary measures, surf the web safety, do not download or open suspicions files\attachments, etc because Anti-Virus, Firewall and all other softwares can't provide 100% protection.
Also you might want to free some system resources for your system by uninstalling your firewall. If this is the case there are much lighter options than Zonealarm (which from my experience is very good but tends to slow down the machine).
| || || |
| | Suzanne Blangsted
Local time: 12:03
Danish to English
I use McAfee's complete package for everything including maintenance of my desktop PC, and I therefore added it to my portable. McAfee has a firewall and all the trimmings for security including spamming.
I previously used ZoneAlarm but had too many problems with that one, as it took complete control of my PC causing problems with my DNS voice recognition system and my bookkeeping system, not allowing upgrades to be installed no matter how much i tweaked ZoneAlarm.
McAfee will automatically upgrade without extra charge.
I would definitely install a firewall even if the current system is stated to have one build in. Microsoft has one in their OS but I never the less added McAffee, and they work fine together, though I believe McAfee supersedes the one from Microsoft.
| A contradiction || Oct 2, 2008 |
Heinrich Pesch wrote:
In my home-office I use a wireless modem which is protected.
Hm... Isn't "wireless" and "protected" a contradiction? Anybody in your neighbourhood can try to use your link and your resources. Of course you can password-protect the connection, but.... they try nevertheless and they have lots of fun trying. Some nerd around you could get access to your network soon. With a cable connection they have to manipulate your cable as the first step, and that is not an easy task as it is with a wireless connection.
Our equipment allows it, but we intentionally switched off the wireless mode both in the office and in our home setups.
To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator:
You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request »
Do I really need a firewall?
|SDL Trados Studio 2017 only €415 / $495|
|Get the cheapest prices for SDL Trados Studio 2017 on ProZ.com|
Join this translator’s group buy brought to you by ProZ.com and buy SDL Trados Studio 2017 Freelance for only €415 / $495 / £325 / ¥60,000
You will also receive FREE access to our getting started eLearning program!
More info »
|For clarity and excellence|
WordFinder is the leading dictionary service that gives you the words you want anywhere, anytime.
Access 260+ dictionaries from the world's leading dictionary publishers in virtually any device.
Find the right word anywhere, anytime - online or offline.
More info »