Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Greek (Ancient) term or phrase:
elenchus
English translation:
cross-examination
Greek (Ancient) term
elenchus
Thank you!!
| 5 +6 | cross-examination |
Nick Lingris
|
| 3 +5 | counterargument |
Kirill Semenov
|
| 3 +1 | Vide infra |
Joseph Brazauskas
|
Jul 12, 2005 14:33: Kirill Semenov changed "Level" from "Non-PRO" to "PRO"
PRO (2): Vicky Papaprodromou, Kirill Semenov
Non-PRO (1): Joseph Brazauskas
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
cross-examination
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elenchos
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 14 mins (2005-07-12 14:43:44 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
A rather more advanced article can be found here:
[http://www.utpjournals.com/product/utq/713/713_furlani.html]
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr 44 mins (2005-07-12 16:13:14 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
My \'Ask the asker\' comes up with a warning, which reads: \"Use the Ask-the-Asker field only to request for clarification on questions. No other use of this field is permitted.\"
So let me try to answer your question here:
Shifts in meaning:
First, the verb (el\'encho):
Used in Homer, meaning \'put someone to shame\'
Then in classical Greek (Herodotus, Plato, the tragics): to cross-examine, to question
Then, the noun (\'elenchos): argument aimed to disprove or refute
Then: cross-examination, any kind of scrutiny aimed to refute.
In the Socratric method: (Wikipedia) a negative method of hypotheses elimination, in that better hypotheses are found by steadily identifying and eliminating those which lead to contradictions.
In the words of Ben Jonson: Hear him problematize... Or syllogize, elenchize. :-)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr 54 mins (2005-07-12 16:23:35 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
And no, I do not believe it is the result of the process, the refutation itself. (And I\'m ready to keep this up until everything is clear in your mind.)
| agree |
Joseph Brazauskas
: Yes, for purposes of refutation.
36 mins
|
|
Thank you, Joseph. Sometimes you don't know how much you can heap on an asker.
|
|
| agree |
Vicky Papaprodromou
45 mins
|
|
;-}
|
|
| agree |
Adam Bartley
: "cross-examination" is the right term here. 'Counter-argument' envisions two competing paradigms, whereas 'cross-examination' involves the examination of an existing one, which is more in the Socratic mode of discourse.
17 hrs
|
|
Thanks.
|
|
| agree |
kaydee
: yes, definitely not the result
3 days 2 hrs
|
|
Thank you, K.
|
|
| agree |
sonja29 (X)
5 days
|
| agree |
Maria Ferstl
10 days
|
counterargument
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 mins (2005-07-12 14:33:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
The literal meaning of \"elenchos\" is close to \"a challenge\" or \"to probe\", \"to test\", I assume
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 mins (2005-07-12 14:36:01 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Or, you may say, an ironical way of enquiry
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr 10 mins (2005-07-12 15:39:51 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Elenchus is certainly not a verb
| agree |
Joseph Brazauskas
: I think tht 'counterargument' is the best single English word to convey the meaning of the Greek, but 'elenchos' is not a verb.
37 mins
|
|
thnank you, dear Joseph -- long time no see :)
|
|
| agree |
Vicky Papaprodromou
49 mins
|
| agree |
Valentini Mellas
1 day 4 hrs
|
| agree |
sonja29 (X)
5 days
|
| agree |
Maria Ferstl
10 days
|
Vide infra
Nonetheless, I would support the rendering of 'conterargument', if I wee to go by my knowledge of Socratic doctrine, always bearing in mind that our knowlede of what Socrates himself actually taught is far from certain.


Discussion