if you want the more direct translation which, however, is not really as acceptable as what I have given you previously with "presented".
Of course you do not understand the
"meaning" because it is more patois than French. "Quil" should more correctly be qu'il but as this is a female, it would even have to be qu'elle ... so what else do you look for?

This is another way, in the context of this translation, to say "based on", "according to".

Il ressort is very idiomatic here as part of the legal jargon. It's from the verb "ressortir", meaning in a legal context: to result, to come out. Therefore the "il ressort" for "it is resulted that"...

Such eighteenth century legal jargon is very frequent in most French-spoken countries formerly colonized by France.
Good luck!

NA

I subsigned XXX attest by the present (document) that pieces of identity surging forth in her possession (show) that the named (individual) YYY, indeed born in AAA.

As you note about the original, this version has no verb either.

Please note that it is personally and professionally excruciating to produce such prose.

Also note that the confidence rating merely reflects a serious client's opinion of the quality of the translated sentence.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2003-01-27 22:37:48 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

I\'ve calmed down now: replace \"pieces of identity\" with \"ID\" or \"identification\" but it\'s still a silly piece of prose.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2003-01-27 23:42:13 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

To respond to Kajuco\'s query. What is the person\'s name: if it looks Greek, it\'s Greece.

Use \"person\" if \"bride\" and \"groom\" appear bold.

Obtain a non-risible product by adding anything you feel you need to ESTABLISH continuity but qualify it with parentheses.

For safety\'s sake, I suppose you could add a literal version of the substandard original in fine print at the bottom or provide an explnation in a footnote.

perhaps the French should be 'qu'il ressort des pièces d'identité....que....
(ie ressortir de)
my suggestion

Representer = to show (Photograph, documents).
= To set out the facts faithfully.
= Agir au nom de (ministre, pays)

Ressort: come under the jurisdiction of[+ domaine] to be the concern, or, province of, to pertain to .
Ceci ressort a une autre juridiction: This comes under, or, belongs to a separate jurisdiction
RESSORTISSANT = National;
Ressortissant francais = French national, or, citizen.

"Il ressort" means "this comes out of the evidence" or "its obvious enough that it jumps out at you".

I'm agreeing, obviously, with Caroline Beaumont as to the meaning; I'm just wording the phrase differently.

Something like:
"I, XXX, the undersigned, attest by this present [these present] that it appears from the identification in the possession of YYY that YYY was born at AAA..."

No need to carry over the emphasis that "effectivement" implies, i.e. "...that YYY was indeed born...".

Why "it appears"? Because the official (XXX) was not present at the birth and cannot, therefore, testify personally to the fact.