May 21, 2003 16:45
21 yrs ago
9 viewers *
English term

typo

English Other
Assistance has for a long time neglected or seriously underestimated the importance of institutional context **for and** embeddedness of reforms.

I'm having trouble with the bit between **.
I'd either go for:
1)take off "for": institutional context and embeddedness of reforms
2)maybre "and" is a typo for "an": context for an embeddedness of reforms.

What d'you guys think?

Responses

+10
5 mins
Selected

institutional context for reforms and embeddedness of reforms

Simply a way of keeping the right prepositions without writing out the sentence the way I did above. Not a typo.
Peer comment(s):

agree Derek Smith
11 mins
Cheers! :o)
agree Belinda Adams
14 mins
Cheers! :o)
agree wrtransco
58 mins
Cheers! :o)
agree Mario Marcolin
1 hr
Cheers! :o)
agree Ino66 (X)
2 hrs
Cheers. I'm not sure, however, whether you believe it to be a typo (you also agree with Yolanda) or you believe I'm right?
agree Magdalena_
3 hrs
Cheers! :o)
agree jccantrell : yep, this is it.Like Dragnet, "....court in and for the county of Los Angeles."
5 hrs
Exactly. The heavier the sentence the better, apparently.
agree DGK T-I : a couple of commas would make it slightly less ugly
6 hrs
Yes, this sentence can only be improved.
agree wendyzee (X)
16 hrs
Cheers! :o)
agree Kardi Kho : and also with other answerers that embeddedness really sounds terrible.
1 day 8 hrs
I believe that people who would create a sentence like this one have taken lessons in 'terrible word structures' - they seem to think that worse is better or something. Cheers ;o)
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "tak ska' du ha'. Thank y'all"
4 mins

for embeddedness of reforms... or..for xxx and embeddedness of reforms....

for embeddedness of reforms.

maybe a word is missing, then it would be
..for xxx and embeddedness of reforms....
Something went wrong...
+2
7 mins

I think you are right

but you may want to ask the person who wrote the text just to make sure
Peer comment(s):

agree David Moore (X) : It's horrendous English; I think yolanda's absolutely right.
48 mins
agree Ino66 (X)
2 hrs
Something went wrong...
+1
15 mins

eliminate the 'for'

As was suggested by another responder 'the context for reforms and the embeddedness of reforms’ is the gist.
However, ‘the context and the embeddedness of reforms’ is more economical. ‘The context of something’ is also correct and the one ‘of’ says it all.
Peer comment(s):

agree DGK T-I : keeps same meaning
6 hrs
Something went wrong...
+2
18 mins

for embedding reforms

I've never heard of "embeddedness of reforms". Maybe it's acceptable bureaucratese, but I think this solution would be best. Or: when embedding reforms.
Peer comment(s):

agree DGK T-I : nicer
15 hrs
agree Kardi Kho
1 day 8 hrs
Something went wrong...
2 hrs

a typing mistake

A typo - is a typing mistake.
Peer comment(s):

neutral pcovs : This wasn't the question. Read on and you will find the real Q.
18 mins
neutral Magdalena_ : :) after so many responses...
33 mins
Something went wrong...
+1
5 hrs

two typos??

Another possibility:

...the importance of THE institutional context AND embeddedness of reforms"

if the general context suggests they can be linked/parallel aspects.

"Embeddedness" sounds terrible to me too!
Peer comment(s):

agree DGK T-I : nicer way to write it anyway
9 hrs
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search