Reparative shampoo and conditioner

20:48 Dec 25, 2015 

My answer was given while this was in EN-EN forum (originally). Charles, thanks for the explanation given.

Why would Edith withdraw the German answer now that it's in the EN-GE forum?

I was curious about the German term and this discussion among native speakers is quite interesting, also the asker didn't provide something like: I was considering x, y or z in German (which would also be interesting).

I was just thinking she posted in EN-EN because she was looking for a distinctive clarification specifically (perhaps having had revitalizing, refreshing, boosting, and something else on the list too, which can be confusing).

20:42 Dec 25, 2015 

...Das sind zwei verschiedene Funktionen (theoretisch)

20:42 Dec 25, 2015 

clear she wanted a translation. I see your point though.

20:01 Dec 25, 2015 

thid id what asker posted: not quite sure what German translation to apply
so very clear that ansker did not want an EN>EN explanation but hit a wrong button is is just inexperienced in using this website. No need to attach Brigitte, but I can withdraw my answer, absolutely no probem.

19:53 Dec 25, 2015 

"disagree" seems harsh when discussion is needed and wanted.

19:45 Dec 25, 2015 

No, it wasn't. It was posted as English-English, and then changed to English-German by Edith K after the first answer was posted. Just look at the bottom of the page if you don't believe me. That change was probably appropriate, since it was clear in the first place that what the asker really wanted was a German translation for the term, but what she originally asked for was an English explanation of the term. All I am saying is that I don't think it's fair to give Lingua 5B a "disagree" for answering the question correctly as it was originally posted.

19:29 Dec 25, 2015 

Cremes und Shampoo wird ein Unterschied zwischen "wiederherstellend" und "revitalisierend" gemacht. Das sind zwei verschiedene Funktionen (theoretisch)

19:09 Dec 25, 2015 

the asker has plenty of good options now and can google as to how "gängig" they are...

18:47 Dec 25, 2015 

It was ENG-GER in the first place, Charles.

18:39 Dec 25, 2015 

that this question was posted as English-English. It was answered by Lingua 5B on that basis. Another user then changed it to English-German. That may have been appropriate, but what is entirely inappropriate is to post a "disagree" for not answering an English-English question in German.

18:24 Dec 25, 2015 

klingt zumindest besser als die Reparatur

18:04 Dec 25, 2015 

"wiederherstellendes Shampoo" - es bringt die Schönheit wieder

18:04 Dec 25, 2015 

ist ein gängiger, wenn auch scheußlicher Begriff.

17:29 Dec 25, 2015 

Some companies call it a "reparierendes Shampoo"; for example Elvital by L'Oréal:
http://www.amazon.de/l-oreal-elvital-reparierendes-shampoo-a...

Or Revlon:
"Interactives Keratin Shampoo – Reparierendes Shampoo mit Keratin"
http://www.beautyspion.de/revlon-professional-interactives-k...