English term
under-utilized female talent pool
4 +4 | Underused women with proper work qualifications | AJ Ablooglu |
4 +3 | Female professionals who are rarely hired | Nadyiia Derkach |
3 +2 | women are a largely untapped source of talent | Teangacha (X) |
Non-PRO (1): Yvonne Gallagher
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
Underused women with proper work qualifications
agree |
philgoddard
1 hr
|
Thank you
|
|
agree |
Anastasia Andriani
1 hr
|
Thank you
|
|
agree |
Ederli Fortunato
2 hrs
|
Thank you
|
|
neutral |
Yvonne Gallagher
: totally disagree with "underused women" but at least you tried to explain though can't see the difficulty
3 hrs
|
much obliged
|
|
agree |
Tina Vonhof (X)
: Also agree with Yvonne: it's not the women that are underused but the talent pool (of women).
3 hrs
|
much obliged
|
|
neutral |
Christine Andersen
: I too do not like the expression ´underused women´, but the idea is right. Women with under-utilised qualifications perhaps?
20 hrs
|
neutral |
B D Finch
: What is "underused" is not "women", but the pool of female talent. Also, qualifications do not equal talent.
1 day 2 hrs
|
women are a largely untapped source of talent
agree |
Christine Andersen
20 hrs
|
Thanks, Christine!
|
|
agree |
B D Finch
1 day 2 hrs
|
Thank you!
|
Female professionals who are rarely hired
agree |
Denisa Altdorfferová-Sedef
9 hrs
|
Thank you :)
|
|
agree |
Christine Andersen
19 hrs
|
neutral |
B D Finch
: It's not necessarily limited to professionals.
1 day 1 hr
|
agree |
Vladyslav Golovaty
1 day 4 hrs
|
Discussion