English term
family lawyer who also chases ambulances on the side
in other words, what kind of family lawyer is he?.. what does chasing ambulances stand for here?
Definition | Travelin Ann |
Dec 4, 2009 20:30: changed "Kudoz queue" from "In queue" to "Public"
Non-PRO (2): Tony M, Travelin Ann
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
1. attorney specializing in family law & 2. ambulance chaser
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambulance_chaser
agree |
Tony M
4 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
eesegura
4 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Eng-Rus/Rus-Eng
: of course
5 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Polangmar
6 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Demi Ebrite
8 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
John Detre
19 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Alp Berker
23 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
David Knowles
36 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Mark Nathan
: Overly insistent lawyers who take the high moral ground, but purely with a view to financial gain. He is probably beaming because there is an opportunity to sue somebody.
39 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Alexandra Taggart
: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_go_chase_an_ambulance_me...
4 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Liam Hamilton
11 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Vicky Nash
12 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Jutta Scherer
: Wow! I knew the term from the crime fiction I read - but never read such a good and succinct explanation of it!
16 hrs
|
Thank wiki. And thank you!
|
|
agree |
airmailrpl
: -
16 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Rolf Keiser
17 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Kay Barbara
1 day 14 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Phong Le
2 days 7 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
ambulance-chaser
So the writer is saying that although the person concerned is basically a respectable 'family' lawyer, s/he also does some of this other, rather more disreputable (but lucrative!) business on the side
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 31 mins (2009-12-04 21:01:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Indeed, clearly not simply 'disreputable', but actually outlawed.
agree |
Demi Ebrite
: Exactly.
9 mins
|
Thanks, Demi!
|
|
agree |
John Detre
: But I'm not sure the text is saying that the person is "basically respectable." I think the words "the kind of family lawyer who..." probably imply that he is basically disreputable.
22 mins
|
Thx, J! Yes, on re-reading, i think you're right: they say 'family lawyer' to suggest he ought to be respectable — which is not in fact the case...
|
|
agree |
airmailrpl
: -
16 hrs
|
Thanks, airmail!
|
|
agree |
kmtext
19 hrs
|
incompetent lawer which often asks for professional help on the side
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 hrs (2009-12-05 01:22:08 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
He is an opportunist, he has second income, grubbs some clients on the side
neutral |
Travelin Ann
: -
55 mins
|
disagree |
Woodstock (X)
: Your answer is inadequate on several levels. You might want to do more research before providing misleading answers.
5 hrs
|
You are right, sorry.
|
|
disagree |
Jim Tucker (X)
: Nothing suggests incompetence; only immorality.
"Which" is not English here.
"On the side"does not refer to friends.
Look up "ambulance-chaser."
6 hrs
|
I realised my mistake when I remembered "Robodoc", this film, actually starts with a situation and the whole film is a parody on modern relations between doctors and a lawer.Agree with "which".
|
|
disagree |
Tony M
: Agree with Woodstock and JT
7 hrs
|
Reference comments
Definition
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-an-ambulance-chaser.htm
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,732010,00.html
neutral |
Tony M
: Yes, that way round is true; but here, we already know he is a lawyer... 'chasing ambulances' (even by proxy) is clearly a sideline ;-)
6 hrs
|
True that we know, in this case, that the individual is a lawyer. I was simply trying to provide some background, since at least one answerer did not understand the meaning of ambulance chaser.
|
Discussion
Chasing ambulances refers to a lawyer who looks for clients who have suffered damages of some sort, who he can represent in a damages lawsuit, and thus increase his own income. For example, a pedestrian who has been struck by a vehicle, and is taken away in an ambulance - hence, the term.