Glossary entry (derived from question below)
French term
gratuite
I understand the meaning, but am not sure about the best way to render it in this context.
| 5 +11 | wanton |
Chris More (X)
|
| 2 +6 | gratuitously |
Jonathan MacKerron
|
| 5 +2 | gratuitous |
Carol Gullidge
|
| 4 +2 | unjustified |
Chris Pott
|
| 5 | mindless |
Jennifer Levey
|
| 4 +1 | comment |
Bourth (X)
|
| 4 | wanton/ unnecessary |
Debbie Tacium Ladry
|
Mar 12, 2006 21:09: df49f (X) changed "Field" from "Art/Literary" to "Other" , "Field (specific)" from "History" to "General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters"
Non-PRO (2): df49f (X), Richard Nice
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
wanton
gratuitously
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 mins (2006-03-12 20:47:36 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
unwarranted
| agree |
suezen
: gratuitous. Could also use unfounded/unmotivated but gratuitous is better IMO
2 mins
|
| agree |
Philip Taylor
: gratuitous
3 mins
|
| agree |
Sara Noss
12 mins
|
| agree |
Tony M
: gratuitous
18 mins
|
| agree |
Carol Gullidge
: but use the adjective, not adverb, as Dusty and Philip suggest)
22 mins
|
| agree |
Assimina Vavoula
10 hrs
|
mindless
wanton/ unnecessary
comment
"Wanton" already has a notion of "intent, deliberateness", so to repeat "deliberate" is pointless.
"wanton - 3. senseless, unprovoked, unjustifiable, or DELIBERATELY malicious ..."
Possibly "wanton" is sufficient. Otherwise the obvious "deliberate" could well be replaced by something like "orchestrated", if the implication is that the people doing the extermination were set to the task by a higher authority.
"orchestrated wanton extermination". Which reminds me, that Slob. Milosevic is dead, none too soon. Plus ça change, plus ça reste la même chose.
| agree |
Joanne Nebbia
: but did he jump or ....
12 mins
|
|
Heart attack, it was announced an hour or so ago. If he was pushed, whoever did it deserves a medal in my books (having just rewatched "Warriors").
|
|
| neutral |
Debbie Tacium Ladry
: My dico has various definitions for wanton, but none of them include a sense of deliberateness. In this context, 'wanton' means having no just foundation or provocation. Or: merciless and inhumane.
33 mins
|

Something went wrong...