Feb 25, 2007 23:50
18 yrs ago
Russian term
повторять результаты
Russian to English
Science
Science (general)
scientific writing
Статья ... повторяет результаты, которые автор настоящей статьи получил и опубликовал более 35 лет назад.
Имеется в виду, что один автор опубликовал результаты как новые, а оказалось, что они уже когда-то давно были опубликованы другим автором.
У меня ощущение, что я когда-то задавал похожий вопрос. Найти не смог
Имеется в виду, что один автор опубликовал результаты как новые, а оказалось, что они уже когда-то давно были опубликованы другим автором.
У меня ощущение, что я когда-то задавал похожий вопрос. Найти не смог
Proposed translations
(English)
Proposed translations
+3
1 hr
Selected
repeat the results
To my non-native ear, this seems most natural, given that the same results were obtained without any knowledge of the previous results.
The causation of smoking to cancer, for instance, was only confirmed after many studies repeated the results. If you hear or read about a poll, study, ...
www.pivot.net/~jpierce/Brief Guide to Statistical Manipulat...
The causation of smoking to cancer, for instance, was only confirmed after many studies repeated the results. If you hear or read about a poll, study, ...
www.pivot.net/~jpierce/Brief Guide to Statistical Manipulat...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you all!"
1 min
reproduce the results
.
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
GaryG
: In this context this suggests something done to confirm a scientific result and would normally be the translation of воспроизводить
4 mins
|
Yes, your variant is probably more up to the point
|
+6
4 mins
replicates the results
I think that this is closest to the idea
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Vitaly Kisin
: quite; or "are a replica of the results...". You reoroduce someone's results if you wish to check if those were correct
1 hr
|
neutral |
Alexander Demyanov
: "Replicate" seems to be more like "duplicate", i.e. produce again with the original in mind. Per asker's note to Jennifer's anser. Author 2 had no knowledge of Author 1's results.
1 hr
|
agree |
Olga Cartlidge
2 hrs
|
neutral |
Marina Khonina
: Agree with Alexander. Replication implies that the second author knew about the article published 35 years prior to his article.
2 hrs
|
No, repiication can also be accidental
|
|
agree |
Arthur Allmendinger
7 hrs
|
agree |
Kirill Semenov
7 hrs
|
agree |
diana bb
11 hrs
|
agree |
Dorene Cornwell
: Replicate to me does NOT imply that the second author knew of the (reviewer's?) previous publication. Replicate is more neutral than confirm or duplicate which is why I like it here.
16 hrs
|
+1
2 mins
reiterates the results
Just one option. I'm sure others will come up with more.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 16 mins (2007-02-26 00:06:58 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
I think it works here as well. It depends on how you read the original: did author 2 do his own study and get the same results as author 1, or did author 2 just restate author 1's results, essentially committing plagiarism? If the former, then GaryG's "replicate" works best; if the latter, then "reiterate".
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 16 mins (2007-02-26 00:06:58 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
I think it works here as well. It depends on how you read the original: did author 2 do his own study and get the same results as author 1, or did author 2 just restate author 1's results, essentially committing plagiarism? If the former, then GaryG's "replicate" works best; if the latter, then "reiterate".
Note from asker:
I don't think reiterate fits here. It would do if one author published the same results twice, no? |
Author 2 did an independent study and was unaware of author 1's results. They both obtained the same results independently, one somewhat earlier |
+1
47 mins
mirrors the results
This set of findings mirrors the results of other research at NRC and elsewhere, which has shown that highfrequency electronic ballasts improve visual ...
irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/pubs/ctus/10_e.html - 30k - Cached - Similar pages
irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/pubs/ctus/10_e.html - 30k - Cached - Similar pages
7 hrs
the findings in the article...recur
*
10 hrs
coincide with the results
.
Something went wrong...